Skip to main content

Mobile @ Priory–the secret classroom

the secret classroom

On Wednesday, we created a secret classroom in the school’s main hall.  Then we invited everyone to see it. 

We were showcasing the work created during the second phase of the Mobile @ Priory project.  The aim was to create some embedded learning sequences that made use of mobile devices (including pupils’ own) so that the mobile device policy could be built upon.  Of course, in the tradition of guerrilla (chalk graffiti for example) we wanted to hold a trade fair with a difference. 

An overview of the project is represented in this graphic, I’ve tried to avoid any jargon or too many subject specific terms.

image

I’ll try to describe the main findings before digging deeper.  I’ll post about each individual lesson separately, hopefully as a guest post from each teacher.  These findings are preliminary as we are still evaluating. Also, I’m keen to point out that the use of mobile devices is only presented as tool for learning.  Like any other tool, including glue sticks and mud, using it is only effective if its use is both appropriate and linked to sound learning objectives.

  1. If you give teachers time to collaborate and plan, fantastic learning sequences will occur.  This isn’t limited to this project.  Each teacher was given three hours with the amazing Ian and Lee from Borbonesa and DiGITAL LEADERS.  The young people were simply stunning, working with the adults in a truly breath taking and unexpected way.  Three hours may seem a lot, but considering that teachers get five days per year or around 25-30 hours, of in-school Inset days, completely doable in my opinion.  Each group of people brought something valuable to the table.  Teachers the expert knowledge of their subject and curriculum context; the DiGITAL LEADERS the perspective of young people and what they can actually do (as opposed to what we think they can do) and Ian and Lee the creative input.
  2. It’s not about the device, it’s about the learning. DTRM folding bookAs this image shows (a folding project booklet put together for the DTRM @PrioryBench project), good quality resources are needed to support learning.  Young people do have almost ubiquitous and easy access to technology, but as consumers.  They simply aren’t aware necessarily of how to use the devices to be creative.  Google et al simply don’t provide the guidance for the creative process for most students.  Yes, there are the case studies of the brilliant, self-driven entrepreneur young person, but I would argue that they would rise even if there wasn’t access to technology.  Learning needs to be well supported and linked into solid learning sequences.
  3. Trust young people and they deliver. Most of the time.  I work in what could be considered a challenging school.  Over the past year, when encouraging young people to be independent and collaborative, they have been.  The learning has been messy and lower ability students still need the ‘quick win’ and encouragement that ‘right’ answers give.

During the day, we collected live information about student devices using a giant paper scrolling machine.

giant paper scrolling machine

live lego graphThe DiGITAL LEADERS captured the event as well as holding discussions on the way forward with this project.  They also helped to keep track of data using a ‘live’ graph created from Lego.

Did we engage everyone? No, especially some teachers.  Did we start conversations? Yes, I think we did.  Did we create disruption? For sure.  Will that disruption result in change and the adoption of mobile devices? It already has. 

More to come?…………

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What makes a learning experience profound? Personal reflections and possible implications for classroom practice.

I have recently begun a Leadership Pathways journey.  As part of the first core day, we were asked to reflect on a profound learning experience. This got me thinking about how many profound learning experiences I have both been involved in, and how many I have been able to give to others.  Our group came up with a huge long list, but these are my five. Emotional Connected Demanding Reflective Collaborative As always, these are personal thoughts and quite mixed up.  I put them here so that I can look back on them (plus they’d get lost inside my world-cup-free brain) 1. Emotional I can’t think of a time where deep learning hasn’t engaged my emotions.  From being awe inspired to that tingle feeling when a student gets a light bulb moment.  From this-is-the-happiest-day-ever, to I-think-I’m-about-to die.  How often do we engage the emotions of those we teach?  Here, I would argue that having a safe learning environment is not always conducive to profound

The danger of Teaching and Twitter conversations: poorly formed bipolar arguments.

Sometimes in life, there really are only two options.  Get the wrong one and you can look like a muppet.  Take this useful sign for the toilets in Morocco.  I successfully navigated it, choosing the right option.  The result? No egg on my face.  As a mountain leader, there are many right or wrong decisions that I’ve faced, as there are all over life.  It’s not a good idea to let inexperienced young people walk themselves down Snowdon.  They may die or be seriously injured.  If someone is showing the signs and symptoms of hyperthermia, you need to treat it fast in a specified way.  There is no real arguing with this sign: Other options are less obvious.  Take this sign recently spotted near to where I live: Now, I wouldn’t consider sleeping in a bin.  However, faced with a sub-zero night, I could see the appeal.  The danger? Being tipped into one of those huge lorries with a compactor. (by the way, I only really considered all of this thanks to questions from my four year old boy).

Banned Word Board

Today I want to share some simple ideas that I have found to be very effective in the classroom. I can't say that they are my own original ideas, although I have played around with them. The first is the Banned word Board. This is a simple display in the classroom that lists a number of words that are not allowed to be used by pupils in their written or oral answers. The effect has been an increase in the quality of written work, and I have almost made comments such as 'Sir it's simple, the stuff just affects the thing and causes people problems'. Pupils are now more able to use specific language, something that is vital especially at GCSE. I have had to make a few modifications, such as the introduction of 'Heavenly Words' This is an additional display placed on the ceiling. I found this necessary as pupils needed some stimulus in finding replacement words. After advice received after posting the idea on the SLN forum , I have also introduced semi-banned words